Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned in The Obama White Houseabout the Future of Faith in America is the new book from Michael Wear. It was
the title of the a lecture he recently gave at the University of Birmingham,
where he is a Honorary Research Fellow in the Edward Cadbury Centre for the
Public Understanding of Religion.
I must admit I was wondering, after the lecture where Wear
was clearly jet lagged, what the book would be like. I found it an easy but
thought provoking read and not at all the academic text I was perhaps
expecting.
This book can be described as part memoir, part political
and social analysis and part reflection on Obama. It might be best described as
thoughts from a reflective practitioner.
The relationship between evangelicals, Catholics, staff in
the Office of Faith Based and Neighbourhood Partnerships and more secular staff
in other parts of the Obama team is examined here from the perspective an insider
located in a particular place.
He is an evangelical and by virtue of his Democratic
involvement, clearly a more progressive one. He also has a Catholic background
coming from an Italian Heritage background. These aspects of identity which he
outlines in the book clearly shape his perspective on a range of issues he
looks at, particularly those which might be described as moral issues.
As an English reader I found this book useful to highlight
where similarities and differences lie between our two cultures and the
political and religious landscapes within them. Some like the way in which our
welfare system means some of the debates have been dealt with and put to bed
for many years (such as on the funding for contraception) are widely known and
discussed.
Others like the similarities between the place Obama found
himself on with regard to same sex marriage in his initial campaign and where
many in the British system are now were enlightening. This latter issue is one
where my analysis differs from the conclusions which Wear came from and perhaps
also stem from the fact we appear to have different positions on the issue.
For Wear the fact that Obama appears to have had a
different personal and professional position on same sex marriage during the
first election campaign and part of that candidacy and then appears to reverse it
when advocating the legitimacy of same sex marriage is very problematic. It is,
he argues, an example of why we might then find ourselves questioning what is
said by Obama on other issues. I want to argue that whilst there is some truth
in that it is actually emblematic of how many evangelicals (and others) have
behaved on this issue. It also illustrates how some of the problems that
Bishops in the CofE (following synod’s decision not to take note face).
If we go back to 2008 there were known to be many people,
including some cis het national evangelical leaders on both sides of the
Atlantic, who were privately of the view that same sex marriage in monogamous,
loving relationships was ok, but none had broken ranks. Publicly, they towed
the line they were opposed to these and so Obama was simply taking the standard
line. He wasn’t lying as such….rather he was separating his private and public
view on it.
Coming back to 2017, this tension between the private and
the public view does not hold in the way it did. However, in some groups such
as the CofE there has been a tacit approval of this being the way to hold
consensus on an apparently controversial issue.
Whilst I don’t agree this is ideal it is why I don’t
condemn Obama on this in the way Wear appears to. For those who might fall into
this category of having “private” and contradicting “professional” views
reading Wear’s analysis may be useful in seeing exactly what the problems with
this are.
With regard to the subject of Hope, Wear ends with some
thoughts regarding where we have come to. Within this section he talks about
how in an increasingly secularised world we have put hope into politics which
becomes problematic and turns politics itself into a religion. Within this
thinking he gives an indication of how we have reached our current polarised
situation with regard to politics and how we might move on from this.
Is this a book I would recommend? The answer is yes as a
quite interesting book which can be quickly consumed by somebody with a general
interest in politics and or religion. For those who might be looking at this in
light of his work at Birmingham University and expecting something meaty,
probably not. I enjoyed the book and learnt some things from it but it did not
give the depth I hoped it would.
*Note this post is going on both my blog sites.